> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.biomni.phylo.bio/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Scientific Review

> Ask a second agent to critique a completed Biomni response

Scientific Review asks a separate reviewer agent to examine a completed response.
The reviewer looks for scientific errors, unsupported claims, incorrect use of
data, missing limitations, and places where the evidence does not support the
conclusion.

## Run a review

1. Wait for Biomni to finish its response.
2. Select **Review** on the latest answer.
3. Keep the task open or continue elsewhere while the review runs in the
   background.
4. Read the review when it appears beneath the answer.

Only one scientific review runs at a time for a task. The Review action is not
available while the agent is still working or when there is no completed answer
to assess.

## Use the findings

Treat the review as a critique, not a certification. It can identify issues and
suggest corrections, but it is still generated by an AI system.

Useful follow-ups include:

```text theme={null}
Address the review's concerns about the control group and rerun the analysis.
```

```text theme={null}
Which review findings change the conclusion, and which only affect presentation?
```

```text theme={null}
Create a revised report that distinguishes observed results from interpretation.
```

## Review checklist for important work

For clinical, regulatory, safety-critical, or publication-ready work:

* inspect the underlying data and generated files;
* open and verify cited sources;
* confirm tool versions, parameters, and statistical assumptions;
* reproduce key calculations independently; and
* have a qualified human review the final conclusions.

<Warning>
  Scientific Review reduces the chance that an issue goes unnoticed. It does not
  replace expert review or independent validation.
</Warning>