Scientific Review asks a separate reviewer agent to examine a completed response.
The reviewer looks for scientific errors, unsupported claims, incorrect use of
data, missing limitations, and places where the evidence does not support the
conclusion.
Run a review
- Wait for Biomni to finish its response.
- Select Review on the latest answer.
- Keep the task open or continue elsewhere while the review runs in the
background.
- Read the review when it appears beneath the answer.
Only one scientific review runs at a time for a task. The Review action is not
available while the agent is still working or when there is no completed answer
to assess.
Use the findings
Treat the review as a critique, not a certification. It can identify issues and
suggest corrections, but it is still generated by an AI system.
Useful follow-ups include:
Review checklist for important work
For clinical, regulatory, safety-critical, or publication-ready work:
- inspect the underlying data and generated files;
- open and verify cited sources;
- confirm tool versions, parameters, and statistical assumptions;
- reproduce key calculations independently; and
- have a qualified human review the final conclusions.
Scientific Review reduces the chance that an issue goes unnoticed. It does not
replace expert review or independent validation.
